Group3: Difference between revisions
From canSAS
AdrianRennie (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
NOTES | GROUP C NOTES | ||
Brian Pauw Leading | |||
=== Discussed: === | |||
* Lack of tools and/or awareness thereof outside of biosas - In particular fitting and modeling tools | |||
* Publishing best practice data correction for different standard types of measurements | |||
** specially GI | |||
** multiple scattering estimation and ways to handle | |||
* Q and resolution standard | |||
* More complex round robins | |||
* Certification of range of validity of instruments? | |||
* Database of corrected measurements for a wide range of materials with associated metada in NXcanSAS format preferably - maybe something like a like a PDB for materials? Or other? – good metadata important, tags need to be defined so you don't end up using different names for the same thing – new SLAC effort could potentially be co-opted for such a purpose? | |||
* Uncertainties in multiple techniques fits | |||
* Tools for multiple scattering would be useful | |||
=== Top Thoughts for Going Forward === | |||
* Publishing best practice data correction and terminology for different standard types of measurements | |||
* Database of corrected measurements for a wide range of materials with associated metada in NXcanSAS format preferably | |||
Revision as of 20:09, 5 June 2017
GROUP C NOTES
Brian Pauw Leading
Discussed:
- Lack of tools and/or awareness thereof outside of biosas - In particular fitting and modeling tools
- Publishing best practice data correction for different standard types of measurements
- specially GI
- multiple scattering estimation and ways to handle
- Q and resolution standard
- More complex round robins
- Certification of range of validity of instruments?
- Database of corrected measurements for a wide range of materials with associated metada in NXcanSAS format preferably - maybe something like a like a PDB for materials? Or other? – good metadata important, tags need to be defined so you don't end up using different names for the same thing – new SLAC effort could potentially be co-opted for such a purpose?
- Uncertainties in multiple techniques fits
- Tools for multiple scattering would be useful
Top Thoughts for Going Forward
- Publishing best practice data correction and terminology for different standard types of measurements
- Database of corrected measurements for a wide range of materials with associated metada in NXcanSAS format preferably
